More
Than Human:
The Network is More Than the Sum of its Parts when Disaster Hits
By Richard Thieme
A friend who immersed himself in the study and
practice of karate left the late show at the movies one night
and turned a corner
toward his car. A hand came out of the darkness and grabbed him
by the shoulder. He immediately turned and with one swift cut,
broke his assailant’s neck.
Except it wasn’t an assailant. It was a friend
who had wanted to say hello.
“Be sure that what you practice is what you want to do,” he
told me, “because when you don’t have time to think,
what you have practiced is what you will do.”
Bob Weaver, the Assistant Special Agent in charge of the US Secret
Service New York Field Office, which includes the Electronic Crimes
Task Force, has been practicing for a long time. He has more than
twenty-five years of government service, and as head of the NYECTF,
he supervises a dedicated staff of high tech crime fighters and
criminal investigators. When the attack on September 11 put their
office at the center of Ground Zero, they did what they had practiced.
That practice plus their ability to execute under
fire in a war zone is a pattern for all organizations. Sec. 105
of the “Patriot
Bill,” the “expansion of the national electronic crime
task force initiative,” requires that the Director of the
United States Secret Service “develop a national network
of electronic crime task forces, based on the New York Electronic
Crimes Task Force model, throughout the United States, for the
purpose of preventing, detecting, and investigating various forms
of electronic crimes, including potential terrorist attacks against
critical infrastructure and financial payment systems.”
How did the New York Electronic Crimes Task Force become a model
for the rest of the country?
“Our unique skill set starts with protection,” Weaver
said, “which I see as an asset, not a detriment. We had to
learn how to share. We’re a small agency and our weakness
is our strength – we have to partner. We can’t be the
guys in the plane, on the boat, on the corner, so we have to partner
with corporations, with state city and local, with military, and
depend on all of them for key strategic pieces. This created our
institutional culture and made us responsive. That’s why
we became a model for local inter-agency cooperation and private-public
partnership.”
The NYECTF represents a confederation of law enforcement agencies,
public prosecutors, academia, and private industry institutions
in a strategic alliance to pool their core competencies to address
electronic crimes. The Task Force surrounded itself with some of
the best people in technology, which meant joining forces with
the private sector.
"When it comes to technology,” Weaver said, “we
don't always have the expertise, the right tools or the people
with the right type of knowledge to work some of our cases. The
private sector gives us that."
So “partnership” is more than a buzzword for the NYECTF.
It’s the essence of their culture.
On September 11, it saved the day.
“
We used bricks and mortars like everybody else,” Weaver said, “but
when the bricks and mortar went down, we were comfortable in the
virtual world. If we had not been, we would not have been operational
within 48 hours. We would have been wiped out and we would have
stayed wiped out.” The Secret Service offices were on the 9th and 10th floors of
7 World Trade Center, one of several buildings in the WTC concourse,
connected to the complex at the base of the north tower so their
windows faced the front of the WTC and looked up at the north tower.
“When the first plane hit we looked up out
of our building and saw the fire and explosion. It was easy to
see that it was
time to evacuate.
“Because we were so flexible, we were able to have our ‘bricks
and mortar’ 100% catastrophically destroyed but our virtual
component had us operational within 48 hours. I attribute that
directly to the corporate partnerships that we had developed, plain
and simple.”
The cell phones went down in the immediate aftermath of the attack
so they used two-way pagers to communicate. Once they were back,
they used cell phones too.
Cellular and paging networks are the only wireless
networks currently used. “We don’t use wireless computer networks. It’s
not that they cannot be secure, but they are currently not at the
level of security which would enable us to use them.”
The decision on the right time to use wireless networks will be
made by the Investigative Research Management Division (IRMD) of
the Secret Service and the CIO, not at the level of the field office.
But on September 11, cellular and pager networks
plus the human network – alliances built with the corporate sector – provided
the resiliency they needed.
“We were virtually indestructible because we’re community
based,” Weaver said. “We are a distributed network,
so strong that its like trying to step on mercury. This is a new
model in law enforcement, where we’re not 100% bricks and
mortar. We’re as comfortable in the virtual world as in the
physical.
“What was theory before is now battle-tested.
Redundancy in our network made it robust, not only survivable
but operational.”
No government group can give details of their network operations,
which would constitute a playbook for enemies, so Weaver can only
affirm the importance of the wireless network and the operational
model they had built.
“
It was totally unexpected, of course, a complete surprise when
it happened. We evacuated – which is easy to say but not
easy to do when there are 200-300 people in the building on your
floors for whom you’re responsible. We needed to seek all
of them out to be sure they left safely. That was a coordinated
effort – it wasn’t just me, it was all of us, all
of the agents in the office. Heroic things were done that day.
Great responsibility was taken at great risk, at great sacrifice.
We lost Craig Miller, an employee that we still can’t find.
His body has never been recovered. People here are still grief-stricken.”
As wireless networks become ubiquitous because of mobility, redundancy,
and flexibility, it is unthinkable to allow them to grow without
adequate security, given what’s at stake.
For wireless networks to thrive, “you need bandwidth,” Weaver
notes, “and the capability to encrypt very heavily. You’re
protecting operational data and intellectual property. ‘Operational
security’ is our watchword these days.
“For the last quarterly meeting of the NYECTF,
we scanned lower Manhattan for wireless networks. We were pleased
that some
were heavily encrypted and had changed default settings, which
is good, but we found that 50% of all wireless networks scanned
were unprotected. We had full access to them.
“That is not good,” he said dryly, “particularly
in the financial district.”
“We shared that information with them, not
to embarrass them, but because making them aware of the truth
about less protected
or unprotected networks enabled them to take appropriate action.
“The time has come to pay attention. If not now, when? If
September 11th wasn’t enough, what is?”
The vulnerability of wireless networks is a consistent
factor in incidents investigated by the Secret Service. A news
agency
in New York intercepted the data streams of the New York city police
and fire departments. Mobile data terminals were intercepted. In
fact, anything and everything that can be sent by wire or orally
over the airwaves has been intercepted in New York. For every wireless
possibility – fax, pagers, wireless computer networks, cell
phones – the Secret Service has arrested people and confiscated
equipment.
Often it’s not a criminal doing mischief but a commercial
enterprise selling large numbers of appliances. In the Breaking
News Network case, thousands of customers were sold technology
for decoding software over the Internet. The only way to defend
against the decoding software was to be encrypted at a level that
the software couldn’t crack. That held true for mobile data
terminals as well. If not protected with encryption, they were
vulnerable.
So the NYECTF frequently issues public safety and service messages
and takes a systemic approach. They respond to criminal activity,
issue public notices, and talk to companies so they understand
how criminal ingenuity has compromised their software or products.
Weaver is heartened by the degree of responsiveness
in New York City. “The private sector is increasingly aware and people
are taking appropriate counter-measures. They are getting the game.
There’s a surge in the dollars spent on security. People
doing physical security in New York can not keep up with demand.
There’s a lot more willingness by corporations to spend money
on disaster recovery and network security.
“The same thing happened at Y2K,” Weaver recalls. “Some
said, it was good we had Y2K for practice, but in a way, it was
almost a shame there wasn’t a little nip there because afterwards,
in the afterglow, it was almost as if it was much ado about nothing.
But we learned lessons that helped when disaster really hit. It
can come in an earthquake, a flood, a catastrophic terrorist event.
Y2K raised the bar and the industry and community are better off
for it.”
At this point in the conversation, a colleague handed Weaver a
picture of his former office in flames.
“I can’t believe this picture,” he said, the
tone of his voice lowering. “There are flames shooting out
of my office. There is no other fire on that side of the building
(the West Broadway side) but there is in my office. It’s
incredible.
“I knew we lost everything in the attack, but I guess my
friend wanted to be sure I didn’t forget.”
Memories of those events are never far from Weaver’s conscious
thoughts.
“After we evacuated and relocated, we went
back in for rescue. You have to understand that everything caught
fire and was burning.
The building had long since been evacuated but all of our equipment
was lost. The evacuation was not a safe evacuation. It was a dangerous
environment. Shrapnel was flying and falling, fires were everywhere,
the evacuation was like trying to walk through a mine field.
“Contingency plans are a wonderful thing. Either you have
them or you don’t. Our plans said, take the stairs, so we
did, but at the lobby level, where the stairs ended, it would have
been unwise to go outdoors because shrapnel was falling, hitting
the building, setting cars on fire, so people had to be rerouted
through a side door to the side and rear of the building. That
was done by some key people who took initiative.”
The genuine heroism of ordinary people under conditions of extraordinary
stress was exemplary.
“What kind of person,” Weaver asked, “is a private
citizen in a plane flying over Pennsylvania who takes it on himself
along with people he never met before to make a decision that they
are going to take the plane back? When you consider that person – how
he grew up, his ethics, his principles, his values – you
have to put him on a level with the police and firemen and Port
Authority personnel and all the others including Secret Service
who ran in when everyone else was running out.”
Because of the shift in how Americans experience themselves in
light of the attack, words that might have seemed affected before
September 11th are now the simple truths of our lives.
“There really is a call to public service,” Weaver
acknowledged. “In the Secret Service Headquarters in Washington
DC, in the main entrance, etched in stone, is a five-pointed star.
On the points of the star are five words: duty, justice, courage,
honesty, and loyalty. Those attributes were chosen for a reason.
The words are indelible, etched in stone, and they mean something
important to us.”
Out of his tested commitment and twenty-five years experience,
Weaver has solid advice for anyone willing to listen.
There must be a systemic approach to security that
addresses the real underlying issues. That means working first
in a preventive
mode, a risk management mode. “No one wants to be in a crisis
response mode, but when we do have to go there, when we can’t
control things, we can manage things. If we could control things
we would have prevented the second plane from hitting. We couldn’t.
But we can manage how we respond.”
Again and again, wireless networks as a metaphor for human networks
emerged from our discussions. The level of security demanded by
electronic networks is now demanded by society.
“We have to approach security issues as a community,” Weaver
said. “That’s what partnerships have taught us. When
corporations find a way to have a value-added relationship that
is mutually beneficial with government entities like ourselves,
they become aware of what’s going on in the community and
with our help get a peek under the hood that keeps them forewarned.
This is always a work in progress – none of us really anticipated
the degree to which there would be such a misuse of technology – so
the work in progress is very high maintenance.
“But even when we have that mutually beneficial relationship,
many stop once they know the problem and identify a solution. That’s
not enough. Implementing solutions and producing a work product
that has deliverables and outcomes is the end game. That’s
how businesses keep score and we run parallel with that.
“When it’s in our best interest, we
form alliances and creates bridges to one another. But those
bridges must be built
before critical incidents happen.
“People in New York that worked with us knew
about pager intercepts of data, cellular intercepts, computer
intercepts, and
wireless networks because we shared that information with them.
That enabled them to protect their bottom line.”
Weaver knows that corporations want to answer one question when
they spend money on security: are they getting a bang for their
buck? Businesses spend an average of 3-5% of their budgets on security.
Does that investment return a profit?
Weaver can’t provide numbers to answer that question but
knows from experience that “if you’re not exercising
due diligence at this stage of the game, you’ll pay for it
later. Do you want to pay now or pay later? Are you willing to
risk corporate assets on a gamble that it won’t happen to
you? If you are, best of luck.”
Physical security is impossible to separate from
IT security. “They
will be joined together forever,” he said. “Information
is a hard asset. People must understand it’s value.”
Maybe there is a simple way to quantify these issues, he added.
“What don’t you want people to have? That’s
exactly what they want. Then, what would your company be without
it?”
The NYECTF reports quarterly to the community on its efforts.
At an invitation-only meeting on November 27, 2001, many of the
200 corporations, 12 universities, and 50 law enforcement agencies
that belong to the Task Force sent representatives to hear Weaver
and his colleagues describe a new initiative. They announced a
program to support homeland defense by creating programs for education
and awareness at the community outreach level. This effort includes
a partnership with this writer who is Founder and Director of the
Homeland Defense Network, a grassroots effort to identify and make
available a wide variety of opportunities for people on the home
front/front lines to be educated, trained and supported in realistic
ways for their roles in a protracted war with terrorism. They also
announced a new initiative to help businesses with physical security
audits.
“We do come back,” Weaver concluded, looking at the
picture of his office in flames. “There’s a resiliency
in the human spirit that’s wonderful. Just pour a little ‘miracle
grow’ on it and – here we are again.”
Copyright Secure Business Quarterly, an @stake publication, 2002.
All Rights Reserved.
Reprinted by permission.
|